ArticlePloS one2025
Progress in developing a bark beetle identification tool.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of BugBox, a software platform for AI-assisted bioinventories of arthropods.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents an initial model for bark beetle identification, serving as a foundational step toward developing a fully functional and practical identification tool. Bark beetles are known for extensive damage to forests globally, as well as for uniform and homoplastic morphology which poses identification challenges. Utilizing a MaxViT-based deep learning backbone which utilizes local and global attention to classify bark beetles down to the genus level from images containing multiple beetles. The methodology involves a process of image collection, preparation, and model training, leveraging pre-classified beetle species to ensure accuracy and reliability. The model's F1 score estimates of 0.99 and 1.0 indicates a strong ability to accurately classify genera in the collected data, including those previously unknown to the model. This makes it a valuable first step towards building a tool for applications in forest management and ecological research. While the current model distinguishes among 12 genera, further refinement and additional data will be necessary to achieve reliable species-level identification, which is particularly important for detecting new invasive species. Despite the controlled conditions of image collection and potential challenges in real-world application, this study provides the first model capable of identifying the bark beetle genera, and by far the largest training set of images for any comparable insect group. We also designed a function that reports if a species appears to be unknown. Further research is suggested to enhance the model's generalization capabilities and scalability, emphasizing the integration of advanced machine learning techniques for improved species classification and the detection of invasive or undescribed species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.