ArticlePloS one2025
Rivalry between pitch and timbre in auditory stream segregation.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intelligibility of interrupted and checkerboard speech with two talkers: Further evidence for four speech cue channels.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two rapidly alternating tones with different pitches may be perceived as one integrated stream when the pitch differences are small or two separated streams when the pitch differences are large. Likewise, timbre differences between two tones may also cause such sequential stream segregation. Moreover, the effects of pitch and timbre on stream segregation may cancel each other out, which is called a trade-off. However, how timbre differences caused by specific patterns of spectral shapes interact with pitch differences and affect stream segregation has been largely unexplored. Therefore, we used stripe tones, in which stripe-like spectral patterns of harmonic complex tones were realized by grouping harmonic components into several bands based on harmonic numbers and removing harmonic components in every other band. Here, we show that 2- and 4-band stimuli elicited distinctive stream segregation against pitch proximity. By contrast, pitch separations dominated stream segregation for 16-band stimuli. The results for 8-band stimuli most clearly showed the trade-off between pitch and timbre on stream segregation. These results suggest that the stimuli with a small number ([Formula: see text]4) of bands elicit strong stream segregation due to sharp timbral contrasts between stripe-like spectral patterns, and that the auditory system looks to be limited in integrating blocks of frequency components dispersed over frequency and time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.