Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40471852›Full record

ReviewAnatomical sciences education2026

There is a method to the madness, and a madness to the method: A beginner's guide to qualitative research.

Angelique N Dueñas, Michelle D Lazarus, Jessica N Byram

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Angelique N DueñasDepartment of Medical Education, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0906-0934
Michelle D LazarusCentre of Human Anatomy Education (CHAE), Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedical Discovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0996-4386
Jessica N ByramDepartment of Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7097-8352

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Qualitative research is increasingly engaged in anatomical sciences education research. However, many in the discipline are not formally trained in qualitative methodology and-like other research methods-qualitative methods are continually developed and enhanced. Indeed, qualitative approaches appear to be entering a new era of acceptability and rigor. As such, those researching, reviewing, and practicing in the anatomical sciences require a strong basis of understanding qualitative methodologies to be able to accurately execute, appraise, and apply qualitative work. This article aims to review core tenets of qualitative research, through the lens of anatomical sciences education by first focusing on: principles underpinning qualitative methods and aspects of philosophy and rigor. The article then transitions to how these principles can be used to understand phenomena through the introduction of common qualitative methodologies, with a special focus on framework analysis as an approachable and widely used method. The authors of this work have, combined, decades of qualitative research experience in the anatomy and health sciences, as well as knowledge of positivist research frameworks. The author's varied paradigmatic experiences provide an opportunity to present qualitative research in a way that is approachable to those who may come from a novice, and often positivist, perspective. The depth of experience also allows for exploration of qualitative research current and future "gray areas." Ultimately, this discursive article covers content that will be supportive to those across the spectrum of experience with qualitative research, and which is applicable to multiple papers in this special issue.

Indexed as

AnatomyQualitative ResearchResearch DesignHumansanatomical sciences/medical educationanatomy educationeducational methodology

Identifiers

PMID40471852
PMCPMC12934368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.