ArticlePreventing chronic disease2025
Engaging a Community-Academic Partnership to Implement Community-Driven Solutions.
Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Solution-Based Research to Address Disparities in Precision Cancer Health: A Case Report Elucidating the Design and Rationale of the Illinois Cancer Health Equity Research (I-CHER) Center.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Leveraging Social Media for Population Health Promotion: Evaluation of a Year-Long Nonprofit Public Health Campaign.Cureus · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap: Recommendations for Sustainable Research Partnerships Between Community Health and Academic Health Centers.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2026Article
- Harnessing the Power of Community Engagement for Population Health.Preventing chronic disease · 2025Article
- Design and implementation of the 6-C model of community engagement.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Community engagement is a pivotal public health tool for addressing population health challenges and advancing health equity. Community-academic partnerships that use community-engaged approaches can prioritize community strengths and ensure that resources and interventions match local needs. In 2021-2022, a community-academic partnership, guided by the principles of community engagement, collaborated with residents of Milwaukee's Near West Side (NWS) to identify strengths and assets and prioritize actions to improve health and quality of life. To inform the development of a planned community resource center, residents were invited for group concept mapping (GCM). GCM includes idea generation, sorting and rating, and developing cluster maps. Residents (N = 165) generated 71 unique ideas in response to the question, "To make the Near West Side a healthier community we need _____." Residents sorted ideas into clusters based on conceptual similarity and prioritized the importance of each. Data were managed with The Concept System Global MAX Software. By using the 71 ideas, a cluster map with 9 domains best fit the data. Domains were high-quality and affordable housing, community-engaged public safety, health and wellness services, strong and inclusive neighborhoods, investments in young people, public infrastructure, sustainable businesses, alternative modes of transportation, and vibrant social spaces. Eight of the 9 domains were highly rated for importance. These domains became focus areas for our partnership's efforts to advance health and well-being in NWS. Our work highlights the significance of projects incorporating community engagement principles within the context of a community-academic partnership to generate mutually beneficial solutions that are strength-based and aligned with partners' priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.