ArticleAnatomical sciences education2026
"We might be put into situations we are uncomfortable with, but not exactly told how to deal with them": Health professional students' experiences questioning low-value care practices during work-integrated learning.
Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- More than words: The value of qualitative research for advancing educational practice.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Health professions students often observe and practice alongside supervising health professionals during work-integrated learning (WIL) to develop essential capabilities. While students may encounter practices they interpret as low-value care during WIL, many hesitate to question or challenge these practices. This study aimed to (1) explore students' perceptions of low-value care and their experiences discussing it during WIL and (2) identify training priorities for education programs to support students and educators in navigating these conversations. A descriptive qualitative study was conducted with health professions students who had completed at least one clinical placement and participated in online interviews. A team-based framework approach was used to identify themes from the data. Thirty-six students from 10 health professions (average age 26 years) were interviewed. Three themes were identified: (1) student conceptualizations of low-value care are multi-faceted, (2) students need safety to initiate conversations about perceived low-value care on clinical placement, and (3) students seek practical training and clear guidance to handle complex conversations during placement. This study highlights the nuanced ways students perceive low-value care, encompassing respect, compassion, and trust, in addition to clinical guidelines. It underscores the importance of pre-placement training and the need to co-design education programs involving students, educators, and healthcare consumers to improve communication skills around low-value care. These findings offer actionable insights for developing supportive teaching and learning interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.