ArticlePaediatric and perinatal epidemiology2026
Placental Abruption and Perinatal Mortality: Abnormal Placentation and Spontaneous Abortion as Contributors to Left Truncation Bias.
Article in Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenerally, studies in perinatal epidemiology restrict cohort entry to 20 weeks of gestation, but exposures and outcomes may occur earlier. This restriction may introduce left truncation bias.
objectivesTo examine the impact of left truncation bias when estimating the causal effect of abruption on perinatal mortality in the context of abnormal placentation, with spontaneous abortion (SAB) as a censoring event.
methodsThrough 80 Monte Carlo simulation scenarios based on realistic clinical assumptions, we estimated risk differences (RD), risk ratios (RR) and bias parameters for the abruption-perinatal mortality association.
resultsCensoring by SAB ranged from 5.6% to 7.6% across simulation setups. The risk of mortality was overestimated in observable (left-truncated) data at ≥ 20 weeks compared to an unobservable cohort starting follow-up at placental implantation (conception cohort). Underestimation of risks was stronger among abruption pregnancies. RDs for the abruption-mortality association were biased by +1% to +3% among conceptions with normal implantation and by +5% to +43% among abnormal placentation. Due to the disproportionate underestimation of mortality among nonabruption pregnancies, RRs were overestimated by 1.1 to 1.2-fold for normal implantations and by 1.1 to 8.4-fold for abnormal implantations.
conclusionsThe findings of this simulation study highlight the critical importance of placentation in successful pregnancy. Abnormal placentation has profound consequences for unsuccessful pregnancies, remarkably increasing the risks of early losses, placental abruption and other obstetrical complications. This study underscores that left truncation can bias the abruption-perinatal mortality association, differentially by whether the placentation was normal or abnormal. However, defining the causal question regarding the abruption-perinatal mortality association requires consideration of the target population, which may include all conceptions. In studies of these effects, outcome follow-up capability may introduce left truncation bias. We do not prescribe one analytic approach to account for left truncation, but rather, the approach should be guided by the causal question.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.