ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2026
Mechanistic Divergence and Differential Antibacterial Potency of the Proline-Rich Antimicrobial Peptide B7-005 Across ESKAPE + E Pathogens.
Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flipping antimicrobial peptides in the exit tunnel of the bacterial ribosome.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Two Shorter Variants of the Proline-Rich Antimicrobial Peptide B7-005 Scaffold Active Against Clinical Isolates ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The antimicrobial peptide EM86 loaded to gamma-irradiated sodium alginate/polyvinyl alcohol electrospun nanofibrous dressing treated multidrug-resistantFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Designing New Chimeric Proline-Rich Antimicrobial Peptides to Enhance Efficacy Toward the ESKAPE+E: Beyond Sequence Extension.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Testing antimicrobial peptides inhibiting protein synthesis in livingFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The urgent need for new antimicrobials is driving the optimization of proline-rich antimicrobial peptides (PrAMPs) as a basis for novel antibiotics to combat multidrug-resistant pathogens. The PrAMP B7-005 has emerged from this process, displaying a broader spectrum of activity compared to similar native PrAMPs and reduced reliance on the bacterial transporter SbmA for its action. While the compatibility and interactions of B7-005 with various mammalian cell types have been investigated, most information on its molecular mechanism of antibacterial action has so far been limited to Escherichia coli. In this study, we investigated the antimicrobial potency and mechanisms of action of B7-005 across the full panel of ESKAPE pathogens, with E. coli included for comparison (ESKAPE + E). The potential of B7-005 to eradicate these pathogens was evaluated in both planktonic and biofilm forms, revealing distinct bactericidal and anti-biofilm effects across the ESKAPE + E pathogens. B7-005's mechanism of action also varied depending on the target microorganism, ranging from intracellular inhibition of protein synthesis without membrane damage to varying levels of membrane permeabilization. Notably, B7-005 consistently inhibited protein synthesis across all ESKAPE + E pathogens, suggesting a possible combination of lytic and non-lytic mechanisms. Furthermore, biochemical analysis of its inhibitory effect on protein synthesis demonstrated that, despite acquiring membrane-destabilizing properties, B7-005 still blocks ribosome progression into the elongation phase, consistent with Class I PrAMPs. B7-005 thus retains the essential characteristics of native PrAMPs while offering a broadened spectrum of activity, highlighting its potential as a lead compound in the development of new antibiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.