Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40471489›Full record

ReviewDiscover oncology2025

Intervention of machine learning in bladder cancer research using multi-omics datasets: systematic review on biomarker identification.

Blessy Kiruba, P S Athul Narayan, Badhari Raj, S Rohieth Raj, Sam George Mathew, Sudhakaran Sajitha Lulu, Vino Sundararajan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Blessy KirubaIntegrated Multiomics Laboratory, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6710-1174
P S Athul NarayanIntegrated Multiomics Laboratory, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India.
Badhari RajIntegrated Multiomics Laboratory, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India.
S Rohieth RajIntegrated Multiomics Laboratory, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India.
Sam George MathewIntegrated Multiomics Laboratory, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India.
Sudhakaran Sajitha LuluIntegrated Multiomics Laboratory, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3392-4168
Vino SundararajanIntegrated Multiomics Laboratory, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632014, India. svino@vit.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0015-8460

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bladder cancer (BC) is one of the most prevalent types of cancer in developed countries. BC is characterized by its highly heterogeneous and dynamic nature, with significantly higher morbidity and mortality rates in men compared to women. Diagnosing BC requires traditional methods, such as cystoscopy, which can be invasive and costly. Recent research has heavily focused on multi-omics analysis, including genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, for biomarker identification. However, challenges such as computational complexity and data integration prevent these methods from achieving robust diagnostic capabilities. Hence, machine learning (ML), with its ability to process high-dimensional data and identify complex patterns, offers a promising patient outcome. By exploiting genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data, these models facilitate the discovery of reliable biomarkers, which are critical for early detection, prognosis, and risk stratification of the disease. Integrated models combining computational techniques with large multi-omics datasets have gained significant attention, enabling the identification of significant BC biomarkers that include genes coding for diverse cellular functions, differentially expressed genes, proteins, and metabolites. A substantial amount of multi-omics data collected from clinics and laboratories are utilized to train powerful ML models such as Support Vector Machines (SVM), random forests (RF), decision trees (DT), and gradient boosting methods (e.g., XGBoost) to perform complex tasks, including biomarker discovery, classification of subtypes and feature selection. This comprehensive review highlights the essence of integrated multiomics-ML approaches for the improvement of prognosis and diagnosis of BC.

Identifiers

PMID40471489
PMCPMC12141719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.