ReviewDiscover oncology2025
Intervention of machine learning in bladder cancer research using multi-omics datasets: systematic review on biomarker identification.
Review in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of Machine Learning in the Research of Heavy Metal(loid)s-Related Risk: A Scoping Review of Methodology.Toxics · 2026Review
- Extracellular Vesicles as Mediators of Pathophysiology and Disease Progression in Cardiovascular Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Urine-Based Approaches for Screening, Diagnosis, and Surveillance of Urothelial Carcinoma.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Manifold-guided SMOTified dual-channel conditional GAN improving highly-imbalanced biomedical data classification.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Advancing Extracellular Vesicle Research: A Review of Systems Biology and Multiomics Perspectives.Proteomics · 2026Review
- Molecular effects of digital psychological intervention for perinatal stress: cell culture, animal model validation, and machine learning-based biomarker identification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Emerging Molecular and Computational Biomarkers in Urothelial Carcinoma: Innovations in Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapeutic Response Prediction.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Emerging technologies and clinical translation of urine-based liquid biopsy in urological cancers.Genes & genomics · 2025Review
- Integrated multi-omics analysis identifies SELENOP and PKMYT1 as immune-metabolic hub genes in breast cancer.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC) is one of the most prevalent types of cancer in developed countries. BC is characterized by its highly heterogeneous and dynamic nature, with significantly higher morbidity and mortality rates in men compared to women. Diagnosing BC requires traditional methods, such as cystoscopy, which can be invasive and costly. Recent research has heavily focused on multi-omics analysis, including genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, for biomarker identification. However, challenges such as computational complexity and data integration prevent these methods from achieving robust diagnostic capabilities. Hence, machine learning (ML), with its ability to process high-dimensional data and identify complex patterns, offers a promising patient outcome. By exploiting genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data, these models facilitate the discovery of reliable biomarkers, which are critical for early detection, prognosis, and risk stratification of the disease. Integrated models combining computational techniques with large multi-omics datasets have gained significant attention, enabling the identification of significant BC biomarkers that include genes coding for diverse cellular functions, differentially expressed genes, proteins, and metabolites. A substantial amount of multi-omics data collected from clinics and laboratories are utilized to train powerful ML models such as Support Vector Machines (SVM), random forests (RF), decision trees (DT), and gradient boosting methods (e.g., XGBoost) to perform complex tasks, including biomarker discovery, classification of subtypes and feature selection. This comprehensive review highlights the essence of integrated multiomics-ML approaches for the improvement of prognosis and diagnosis of BC.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.