Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40471475›Full record

SynthesisThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2025

Economic evaluations of early detection strategies for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.

Robert Wittram, Léon Kreis, Hans-Helmut König, Christian Brettschneider

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert WittramDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Robert Wittram, Martinistr. 52/ Gebäude West 37, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany. r.wittram@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7089-6115
Léon KreisDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Robert Wittram, Martinistr. 52/ Gebäude West 37, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7309-3692
Hans-Helmut König *Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Robert Wittram, Martinistr. 52/ Gebäude West 37, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5711-6862
Christian Brettschneider *Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Robert Wittram, Martinistr. 52/ Gebäude West 37, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5280-1075

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe early detection of pancreatic cancer is an important step in reducing mortality by offering patients curative treatment. The aim of this study was to synthesize available evidence on the costs and cost-effectiveness of strategies for early pancreatic cancer detection.

methodsThe electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, and EconLit were searched for peer-reviewed and published papers in English until April 2024 with no date or contextual restrictions. Economic evaluations of early pancreatic cancer detection strategies compared to alternative or no detection strategies were criteria for inclusion.

resultsThirty-one articles were included, 22 were full and nine were partial economic evaluations. Fifteen studies screened target populations with pancreatic cancer-associated risk factors and 16 conducted surveillance of patients with precancerous lesions. Six studies found early detection strategies to be cost-effective, one did not, and thirteen reported partially cost-effective results. In all studies, populations of interest had an elevated pancreatic cancer risk compared to the general population. Endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography were the most frequently evaluated imaging modalities. Patient engagement, valuation of outcomes and choice of discount rates were among incomplete reporting categories, and narrow evaluation perspectives may have biased the results.

conclusionsEarly detection strategies for pancreatic cancer may be cost-effective for certain high-risk patient groups. However, evaluations so far have applied heterogeneous methods, used different modalities, had various target groups and screened at different frequencies. Further evaluations will be required to systematically synthesize economic evidence regarding specific early detection strategies. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration CRD42023475348.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPancreatic NeoplasmsCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansRisk FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedEarly detectionEconomic evaluationPancreatic cancerSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40471475
PMCPMC12618292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.