Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40471469›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025

Biomorphoelasticity alone: limitations in modeling post-burn contraction and hypertrophy without finite strains.

Ginger Egberts, Fred Vermolen, Paul van Zuijlen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ginger EgbertsComputational Mathematics Group, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium. ginger.egberts@uhasselt.be.
Fred VermolenComputational Mathematics Group, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Paul van ZuijlenBurn Center, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Brandwonden Stichting, Netherlands 17.105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a continuum hypothesis-based two-dimensional biomorphoelastic model describing post-burn scar hypertrophy and contraction. The model is based on morphoelasticity for permanent deformations and combined with a chemical-biological model that incorporates cellular densities, collagen density, and the concentration of chemoattractants. We perform a sensitivity analysis for the independent parameters of the model and focus on the effects on the features of the post-burn dermal thickness given a low myofibroblast apoptosis rate. We conclude that the most sensitive parameters are the equilibrium collagen concentration, the signaling molecule secretion rate and the cell force constant, and link these results to stability constraints. Next, we observe a relationship between the simulated contraction and hypertrophy and show the effects for significant variations in the myofibroblast apoptosis rate (high/low). Our ultimate goal is to optimize post-burn treatments, by developing models that predict with a high degree of certainty. We consider the presented model and sensitivity analysis to be a step toward their construction.

Indexed as

BurnsElasticityModels, BiologicalApoptosisCicatrixCollagenComputer SimulationHumansHypertrophyMyofibroblastsStress, MechanicalCollagen

Identifiers

PMID40471469
PMCPMC12246031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.