ArticleStem cell reviews and reports2025
Outcomes Following Second Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant for Graft Failure or Poor Graft Function: A Single Centre Experience.
Article in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Graft failure is a rare but life-threatening complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We aim to review the outcomes of patients who underwent a second HSCT (HSCT2) for graft failure or poor graft function at our centre. Twenty-one patients were identified between February 2001 and July 2021; 11 with primary and 10 with secondary graft failure. For HSCT2, matched unrelated donor was the most common donor type (33%) and the same donor as the first allotransplant was used in 24%. Most patient received peripheral blood stem cell source (81%) and reduced intensity conditioning (100%). Graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was calcineurin inhibitor-based with either methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil. The median follow-up for survivors was 120 months (range 7-170). Overall survival was 52% at 2 years, and 46% at 5 years. Death before day + 30 occurred in 5 patients (24%). Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was the major cause of treatment failure, with 2-year NRM of 48%. Infectious complications was the most common cause of death. Relapse occurred in 3 patients (14%). All patients who lived beyond day + 30 successfully engrafted, with a median time to neutrophil recovery of 22 days (range 11-31). The incidence of acute GVHD was 50% and chronic GVHD was 50%. Two patients subsequently developed secondary graft failure and both underwent a third allotransplant. Our real-world data confirms that a HSCT2 for graft failure or poor graft function is associated with high NRM and early mortality. Nevertheless, there are long term survivors and further studies should focus on decreasing toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40471438What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.