ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2025
Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Social Skills Improvement System Autism Spectrum Scale.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the SSIS Autism Spectrum Scale Teacher Form, a scale of the SSIS-Rating Scales (Social Skills Improvement System Rating Scales) created by Gresham and Elliott. The scale consists of 15 items divided into two subscales: social skills and problem behaviors related to autism. The participants included 541 school-age children aged 4 to 18 years old (266 females, 275 males). The Autism Behavior Checklist-Taiwan Version Teacher Form was used as a criterion measure. Data analyses were performed using SPSS 25 and Mplus 8.3 statistical package programs, with procedures including reliability testing, criterion-related validity testing, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The results suggested that the SSIS Autism Spectrum Scale Teacher Form has adequate internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity. In addition, the confirmatory factor analysis results supported the two-factor structure of the Chinese version of the SSIS Autism Spectrum Scale Teacher Form.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40471399What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.