ArticleMolecular biology reports2025
Differential effects of minocycline on human breast epithelial cells, human breast cancer cells and their tumor hybrids.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy and survival outcomes of bevacizumab plus minocycline for glioblastoma.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe antibiotic minocycline has been suggested as a potential agent in cancer therapy due to its anti-inflammatory properties and effectiveness as an NF-κB inhibitor. In previous studies, we showed that minocycline could effectively block the fusion of breast epithelial cells and cancer cells. However, its influence on breast cancer cell characteristics, including proliferation, migration, and gene expression has not yet been investigated.
methodsM13SV1-EGFP-Neo breast epithelial cells, HS578T-Hyg breast cancer cells and M13HS-2 and M13HS-8 tumor hybrids were used as breast (cancer) model cell lines in this study. Cells were treated with up to 50 µg/ml minocycline. An XTT assay and a colony formation assay were used to study cell proliferation. Western blot analysis and Zymography were used to examine the expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9, EMT, and stemness marker. Cell migration was measured by Scratch assay. Using a two-way ANOVA and the Tukey post-hoc test, statistical significance was determined.
resultsMinocycline inhibited proliferation and colony formation capacity in a dose-dependent manner, whereas EMT and stemness marker expression remained unchanged in all cell lines. Zymography data showed that MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression was down-regulated M13SV1-EGFP-Neo treated with minocycline, but not in HS578T-Hyg cells or M13HS-2 and M13HS-8 tumor hybrids. Minocycline inhibited the migration of M13SV1-EGFP-Neo cells in a dose-dependent manner, while the migration of HS578T-Hyg, M13HS-2 and M13HS-8 tumor hybrid cells necessitated a minimum of 25 µg/ml minocycline,
conclusionsThe results showed that non-malignant cells and neoplastic cells reacted differently to minocycline. This could mean that minocycline will have unwanted side effects if it is used in cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.