ArticleInsights into imaging2025
Entrustable professional activities in Finnish radiology training: a national survey.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study assessed the practical implementation, experiences, and attitudes toward entrustable professional activities (EPAs) in radiology training across Finland.
methodsA nationwide, anonymous online survey targeted radiology residents, recently graduated specialists (within 3 years), and instructor specialists. Distributed to all Finnish hospitals involved in radiology training, the survey evaluated EPA completion rates, perceived value, and future development needs. Responses were analyzed to identify trends and differences across groups.
resultsOf 150 respondents (42% residents, 43% instructors, and 14% recent graduates), 65% were from university hospitals. Among residents and recent graduates, 37% had completed EPA assessments, with 87% valuing the feedback received and 73% finding EPAs effective for competency assessment. Overall, 64% considered EPAs well-suited to radiology. Residents showed higher completion rates (43%) than recent graduates (19%), with fourth- and fifth-year residents more engaged (69% vs. 15%). Instructors, while supportive (67% viewed EPAs as meaningful), emphasized a need for more training (54% vs. 49% of residents).
conclusionMost Finnish radiology respondents considered EPAs well-suited for training. Residents and recent graduates who completed EPAs greatly valued the feedback and found them effective for assessing competencies, with residents participating more actively than recent graduates. Instructors' desire for better guidance suggests a priority for enhanced support and education. These findings endorse EPA integration and inform refinements in national and European radiology curricula. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Finnish radiologists and residents strongly support EPAs in radiology training, valuing their feedback and competency assessment, though instructors seek enhanced guidance. KEY POINTS: Finnish radiology residents and specialists reported positive experiences and strong support for entrustable professional activity (EPAs). Finland's mandatory, nationally coordinated EPA framework contrasts with subspecialty-focused models elsewhere. Instructors seek more EPA training, signaling a need for enhanced education to sustain their engagement as adoption grows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.