ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
Impact of azithromycin on specific biochemical markers and sebum composition in acne vulgaris patients.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic Effect of Niclosamide versus Triamcinolone on Rabbit Ear Model of Hypertrophic Scar.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Topical ronomilast alone or combined with clobetasol ameliorates imiquimod-induced psoriasis in mice.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- D-limonene attenuates D-galactose-induced skin aging mouse model.Journal of molecular histology · 2025Article
- Gemifloxacin ameliorates acetic acid-induced ulcerative colitis via modulation of inflammatory, oxidative, and adhesive biomarkers and histopathological changes in rats.Journal of molecular histology · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of Photodynamic Therapy, 2% Salicylic Acid, and Their Combination for Moderate Acne.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acne vulgaris (AV) is a persistent inflammatory skin disease that affects the pilosebaceous units. Oral azithromycin has shown significant effectiveness in treating AV, attributed to its robust anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of azithromycin in patients with moderate-to-severe AV, with a focus on its influence on sebum composition and specific biomarkers, including pyridoxine (B6), biotin (B7), cobalamin (B12) (measured by HPLC), and homocysteine (measured by ELISA). A case-control study was conducted at the dermatology department of Al-Imamain-Alkadhimain Medical City, Baghdad. The study included thirty patients aged 15-35 years with moderate-to-severe AV, and thirty healthy individuals of the same age and sex served as a control group. Patients received 500 mg of azithromycin on alternate days for 12 weeks. Laboratory and clinical parameters were assessed at baseline and compared to the control group, then re-evaluated after treatment. The findings indicated a significant decrease in serum levels of folic acid, B7, and B6 at both 6 and 12 weeks post-treatment (p < 0.05). Serum homocysteine levels increased slightly over time, but this change was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). No significant difference in serum B12 levels was observed at 6 weeks (p > 0.05); however, a significant increase was noted at 12 weeks (p < 0.05). Clinical score, skin moisture, and sebum squalene (Sebum-SQ) content improved significantly post-treatment (p < 0.05), while sebum cholesterol (Sebum-Chol.) levels showed significant change only at 12 weeks (p < 0.05). The finding supports the efficacy of azithromycin in managing inflammatory acne and modulating sebum composition and specific biomarkers. However, the relatively small sample size and absence of power analysis limit the generalizability of the results. Future studies with larger cohorts are recommended to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40471325What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.