ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025
[Point-of-care tests for sexually transmitted infections-what is the current status?]
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Point-of-care tests (PoCTs) enable the rapid diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) directly at the point of care and play a central role in achieving the goals of the World Health Organization (WHO) for the global elimination of AIDS and hepatitis and the reduction of STIs by 2030.The European Union's new regulation for in vitro diagnostics raises the quality standards for PoCTs. All STI tests must now undergo more rigorous reviews. Advances in PoCT development have improved testing options for HIV, syphilis, and hepatitis C, particularly through WHO prequalified tests. However, the HIV self-tests available in Germany only detect the antibody component, which means that a negative result is only reliably conclusive 12 weeks after exposure. For syphilis, PoCTs are available for antibody screening, but these still require subsequent laboratory confirmation. For infections with chlamydia, gonococci, and mycoplasma, the quality of PoCTs is still largely inadequate. Further developments in the field of nucleic acid amplification tests (NATs) show promising approaches.PoCTs are particularly beneficial for low-threshold services aimed at marginalized groups, as they enable swift diagnosis and timely treatment within the test setting. However, challenges remain, including quality assurance and potential psychological stress due to false-positive results. There remains a need for continuous development and the integration of PoCTs into the healthcare system in order to improve access to diagnostics and to reduce the spread of infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.