ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025
[More efficient use of resources in research laboratories through quality management].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Quality management in research-the perspective of research teams].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At first glance, research and quality management (QM) could hardly be more different. Research is characterized by freedom, creativity, and flexibility. QM often appears rigid, strict, and bureaucratic. Nevertheless, research laboratories can benefit significantly from the principles of QM, especially when it comes to increasing the quality and efficiency of research and thus making the best possible use of resources that are constantly limited.High research quality depends on various factors. These different influencing factors were examined in detail and implemented in a specific research quality management system (QMS) in pilot laboratories of the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) and at a university institution. The research QMS is based on the requirements of good scientific practice. It was shown that many laboratories have already established processes that can be further optimized and made more efficient by a QMS.A self-assessment tool for laboratory managers was developed to assess the maturity level of laboratory processes. This report provides an overview of the quality in research and shows ways in which this can be improved at the level of the working groups, tailored to their individual framework conditions. For this purpose, a QMS is proposed and a tool for the self-assessment of one's own processes is presented. The report is based on a comprehensive literature review and a cross-departmental and cross-institutional project of the RKI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.