ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Double low-dose abdominopelvic CT for acute appendicitis: early exploratory analysis on image quality and diagnostic performance.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Practical Rule-of-Thumb to Adapt Contrast Media Dose in Photon-counting Detector CT: The 10-to-5 Rule.Investigative radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of a standardized double low-dose CT (DLCT) protocol that simultaneously reduces both iodine contrast media (CM) dose and tube voltage, and to compare its image quality and diagnostic performance with a single low-dose CT (SLCT) protocol using fixed iodine dose and reduced tube voltage, representative of institutional low-radiation dose imaging practice in suspected acute appendicitis.
methodsIn this exploratory analysis of a prospective single-arm study, 49 participants aged 18-44 years presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected acute appendicitis underwent DLCT using automated kVp selection and a kVp- and weight-adjusted CM dosing protocol. This protocol targeted a 10% iodine dose reduction for every 10 kVp decrease from a reference standard of 0.521 g I/kg at 120 kVp. A historical control group of 53 patients with the same inclusion criteria, who had undergone SLCT using a fixed CM dose and low-kVp protocol (80-100 kVp) prior to study initiation, was retrospectively included. Quantitative (signal-to-noise ratio [SNR] and contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) and qualitative (subjective image quality and appendiceal visibility) assessments were compared. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using positive predictive value (PPV) for acute appendicitis and alternative diagnoses, based on surgical findings, clinical follow-up, or an Alvarado score ≥ 7.
resultsDLCT significantly reduced iodine dose (0.383 ± 0.049 g I/kg vs. 0.589 ± 0.085 g I/kg; P < 0.001) while maintaining comparable image noise and appendiceal visibility. Although SNR and CNR were lower in the DLCT group, diagnostic performance including PPVs for acute appendicitis (63.6% vs. 72.7%) and alternative diagnoses (100% vs. 86.7%) did not significantly differ between groups.
conclusionAn iodine dose-reducing DLCT protocol tailored to tube voltage and body weight is feasible in the ED setting and offers substantial CM dose saving without compromising diagnostic performance for acute appendicitis or alternative diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40471255What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.