Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40471248›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026

The potential use of artificial intelligence in reviewing atypical small acinar proliferation in prostate core biopsy.

Shiguang Liu, Mohsin Jamal, Carmen Smotherman, Ifra Badar, Zoobia Khan, Shahla Masood

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shiguang LiuDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA. Shiguang.Liu@jax.ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5381-0320
Mohsin JamalDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA.
Carmen SmothermanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA.
Ifra BadarDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA.
Zoobia KhanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA.
Shahla MasoodDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most common diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death among men in the United States. The gold standard for the diagnosis of prostate cancer is the examination of tissue from a systemic 12- or 14-core biopsy procedure by an anatomic pathologist. Atypical small acinar proliferation in prostate core biopsy is an indefinite diagnosis, and may cause difficulties in clinical management. To investigate the potential use of artificial intelligence in reviewing atypical small acinar proliferation, Paige Prostate, an FDA-approved artificial intelligence-based digital diagnostic system, was used to review the digital images of 107 cores with an initial diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation. Two pathologists blindly reclassified the cores with a new diagnosis (either benign or malignant) for 85% of the cases (pathologist #1) and 88% (pathologist #2), respectively. Paige Prostate resulted in consistent diagnosis in 85% of the cores ("suspicious" or "not suspicious"). The consistency rates were 77% between the two pathologists, 66% and 75% between Paige Prostate and each pathologist. There was statistically significant agreement among the three consistency rates. Although some degree of interobserver discrepancy still exists, our findings indicate that artificial intelligence was compatible with the pathologist review, and it can be a unique diagnostic adjunct for pathologists.

Indexed as

Acinar CellsArtificial IntelligenceImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedProstateProstatic NeoplasmsAgedBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleCell ProliferationHumansMaleObserver VariationArtificial intelligenceAtypical small acinar proliferationProstate biopsy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.