Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40471243›Full record

ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025

Advancing pulmonary therapy: the role of dry powder inhalation technology in lung disease management.

Imran Ahmad, Poonam Kushwaha, Abdul Hafeez

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Imran AhmadFaculty of Pharmacy, Integral University, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, 226026, India.
Poonam KushwahaFaculty of Pharmacy, Integral University, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, 226026, India. poonam@iul.ac.in.
Abdul HafeezFaculty of Pharmacy, Integral University, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, 226026, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic respiratory diseases represent a growing global health challenge, marked by rising prevalence and mortality rates. Inflammatory lung conditions including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute respiratory distress syndrome, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis are major contributors to this burden. These disorders are typically associated with persistent inflammation in the airways or lung tissue, resulting in obstructive or restrictive patterns of respiratory dysfunction. Many of these diseases involve both acute exacerbations and chronic progression, making diagnosis and management particularly complex. Conventional treatments often rely on systemic drug administration, which can be limited by suboptimal therapeutic efficacy and undesirable effects on non-target organs. In contrast, inhalation-based drug delivery offers a more direct and efficient route to the lungs, enabling localized drug action, reduced systemic toxicity, and faster therapeutic onset. Among the various inhalation approaches, dry powder inhalers (DPIs) have gained increasing attention for their user-friendly design, dose consistency, and breath-actuated delivery mechanisms. This review explores recent advances in pulmonary drug delivery, with a particular focus on the design, development, and clinical potential of DPIs. By enhancing site-specific drug delivery and supporting the move toward personalized respiratory therapies, DPIs are poised to play a pivotal role in the future of respiratory disease management.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsDry Powder InhalersLung DiseasesAdministration, InhalationAnimalsHumansAerodynamic performanceCOPDDry powder inhalationLung diseasesPulmonary drug delivery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.