ArticleClinical implant dentistry and related research2025
Magnesium Resorbable Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration in Critical Size Defect Model in Rabbits-Histomorphometric Analysis.
Article in Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Magnesium-Based Membrane for Alveolar Ridge Regeneration-A Scoping Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of a Mg-based membrane as a barrier for guided bone regeneration in rabbits calvaria. MATERIALS AND
methodsNine rabbits had four critical size defects created in each calvarium, randomly filled with a blood clot or bovine xenograft. One side was covered with the Mg-based membrane, and the control was left without membrane. After 8 weeks, histomorphometric analysis was performed to compare new bone formation with the pristine bone.
resultsMg-supported membrane for guided bone regeneration (GBR) is safe and promotes bone formation in critical size defects (CSD) in a rabbit calvaria. Gas accumulation was observed in a third of the specimens due to membrane degradation. Histomorphometric analysis revealed greater bone formation in the defects grafted with the Mg membrane (4.85 ± 1.73 mm
conclusionMg-based membrane supports guided bone regeneration (GBR), and when used in combination with a bone graft, enhances the performance despite the gas accumulation associated with membrane degradation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Limited data exist on the use of Mg-based membranes in GBR and its effect on bone formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.