Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40470945›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2025

Assessing how a teaching professional development program for biology graduate students bolsters self-efficacy and shapes teaching perspectives.

Anisha S Navlekar, Nia Baker, Mackenzie Ghaemmaghami, Imani Obasi, Sochinenyenwa Onubogu, Cassandra O'Pry, Robert Posey, Jessica Tan, Karen Walulu, Joshua W Reid and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anisha S NavlekarDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9958-6985
Nia BakerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Mackenzie GhaemmaghamiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Imani ObasiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Sochinenyenwa OnuboguDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Cassandra O'PryDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Robert PoseyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Jessica TanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Karen WaluluDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Joshua W ReidDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Lisa B LimeriDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7054-7509

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) teach undergraduates directly, and many are future faculty, making it particularly important for them to be trained in using evidence-based instructional practices. We implemented and assessed a teaching professional development program for 19 biology GTAs aimed to help them develop their teaching perspectives and improve their teaching self-efficacy. The program consisted of a pre-semester bootcamp of pedagogical workshops, mentoring sessions throughout the semester, crafting a teaching philosophy statement, and reflective peer teaching observation. We surveyed and interviewed students throughout the program to assess their growth and identify elements of the program that supported their growth. We found that participants' self-efficacy improved immediately following the pre-semester bootcamp, but these improvements did not persist throughout the semester. At the end of the semester, participants' teaching self-efficacy did not differ from GTAs in the department who did not participate in our program. Throughout the semester, our participants shifted toward the social reform perspective of teaching, which views good teaching as encouraging students to critically evaluate information and give them power to take social action to improve their lives. At the end of the semester, our participants more strongly endorsed the social reform perspective of teaching than GTAs who did not participate in our program. Our results suggest that pre-semester workshops supported novice GTAs before their class, but more sustained interactions may be needed for these boosts to persist. Our results also suggest that encouraging GTAs to reflect on what makes good teaching can help them solidify a coherent teaching perspective.

Indexed as

biology labsgraduate student educationteaching perspectivesteaching professional developmentteaching self-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID40470945
PMCPMC12369321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.