Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40470876›Full record

ArticlePlant, cell & environment2025

Hydraulics and Structural Mechanics Jointly Shape Root-to-Leaf Scaling of Xylem Conduit Traits.

Milos Simovic, Sean T Michaletz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant, cell & environment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Milos SimovicDepartment of Botany, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8325-3406
Sean T MichaletzDepartment of Botany, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2158-6525

Funding

This study was supported by NSERC Discovery and Milos Simovic received support from the UBC 4 Year Doctoral Fellowship and Wall Research Award.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xylem conduit morphology is shaped by the challenges of minimizing hydraulic resistance and preventing conduit wall collapse during vertical sap transport. While hydraulic theories predict that conduits widen from tip to base to minimize resistance, theory has not addressed how collapse prevention influences vertical variation in conduit morphology. Additionally, scaling relationships in roots remain largely unexplored. Here, we evaluate existing theories for conduit diameter scaling and synthesize new theory for vertical variation in thickness-to-span ratios. We test these theories using a novel bootstrapping approach to minimize sampling biases and analyze a data set of nearly 600 000 xylem conduits spanning above- and belowground organs from five conifer species. As predicted, conduits widened with distance from the leaf tip, with scaling exponents closely aligning with theoretical predictions. Conduits also widened from fine roots to coarse roots, mirroring aboveground patterns. Thickness-to-span ratios increased from base to tip and consistently exceeded the predicted critical collapse limit. These findings reveal how the physics of sap transport shape xylem morphology to balance hydraulic efficiency and structural stability. By combining novel theory, robust statistical methods, and comprehensive data, this study refines scaling predictions and advances understanding of mechanisms shaping xylem anatomy across plant organs.

Indexed as

Plant LeavesPlant RootsXylemModels, BiologicalTracheophytabootstrappinghydraulic modelplant allometrypower lawscalingthickness‐to‐span ratiotip‐to‐base xylem wideningxylem resistance

Identifiers

PMID40470876
PMCPMC12319298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.