ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Visceral leishmaniasis in heavily pretreated multiple myeloma patients a case series of 17 patients from the Mediterranean Coast of Spain.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe introduction of novel therapies in multiple myeloma (MM) has significantly improved survival rates. However, their immunosuppressive nature predisposes patients to serious opportunistic infections, including visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Due to the rarity of VL in MM patients, specific management guidelines are lacking, and treatments are often extrapolated from those used for HIV-infected patients. This study aims to provide insights into the management of VL in MM patients. PATIENTS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 17 patients diagnosed with MM and VL between 2014 and 2023 across hospitals on the Mediterranean coast of Spain. Clinical data, diagnostic methods, treatment responses, relapses, and outcomes were reviewed.
resultsPancytopenia emerged as the most frequent presenting feature, accompanied by fever and splenomegaly in some cases. VL diagnosis was confirmed in all patients through visual analysis of bone marrow smears, while PCR and serological tests yielded inconsistent results. Treatment with the liposomal amphotericin B (lAmB) 40 regimen resulted in excellent initial responses; however, 53% of patients experienced relapses.
conclusionsGiven the high relapse rate, secondary prophylaxis should be considered for selected patients, particularly those with more than 5 years of MM diagnosis or who have received more than two lines of treatment or immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). This study highlights the need for tailored management strategies for VL in MM patients and underscores the importance of vigilant follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.