Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40470724›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2025

Network Occlusion Sensitivity Analysis Identifies Regional Contributions to Brain Age Prediction.

Lingfei He, Siyu Wang, Cheng Chen, Yaping Wang, Qingcheng Fan, Congying Chu, Lingzhong Fan, Junhai Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lingfei HeCollege of Intelligence and Computing, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cognitive Computing and Application, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Siyu WangCollege of Intelligence and Computing, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cognitive Computing and Application, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0009-0006-4063-6638
Cheng ChenCollege of Intelligence and Computing, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cognitive Computing and Application, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Yaping WangBrainnetome Center, Beijing, China.
Qingcheng FanChinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing, China.
Congying ChuBrainnetome Center, Beijing, China.
Lingzhong FanBrainnetome Center, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4813-621X
Junhai XuCollege of Intelligence and Computing, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cognitive Computing and Application, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4289-647X

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of China 62176181Natural Science Foundation of China 82072099Science and Technology Innovation 2030 2021ZD0200200Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences XDB32030200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning frameworks utilizing convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have frequently been used for brain age prediction and have achieved outstanding performance. Nevertheless, deep learning remains a black box as it is hard to interpret which brain parts contribute significantly to the predictions. To tackle this challenge, we first trained a lightweight, fully CNN model for brain age estimation on a large sample data set (N = 3054, age range = [8,80 years]) and tested it on an independent data set (N = 555, age range = [8,80 years]). We then developed an interpretable scheme combining network occlusion sensitivity analysis (NOSA) with a fine-grained human brain atlas to uncover the learned invariance of the model. Our findings show that the dorsolateral, dorsomedial frontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and thalamus had the highest contributions to age prediction across the lifespan. More interestingly, we observed that different regions showed divergent patterns in their predictions for specific age groups and that the bilateral hemispheres contributed differently to the predictions. Regions in the frontal lobe were essential predictors in both the developmental and aging stages, with the thalamus remaining relatively stable and saliently correlated with other regional changes throughout the lifespan. The lateral and medial temporal brain regions gradually became involved during the aging phase. At the network level, the frontoparietal and the default mode networks show an inverted U-shape contribution from the developmental to the aging stages. The framework could identify regional contributions to the brain age prediction model, which could help increase the model interpretability when serving as an aging biomarker.

Indexed as

AgingBrainDeep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultbrain agebrain atlasconvolutional neural networkinterpretabilityMRI

Identifiers

PMID40470724
PMCPMC12138582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.