ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025
Implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention: Analyzing clinical practice and key characteristics.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changing Practices of Opportunistic Salpingectomies and Oophorectomies From 1997 to 2017: A Nationwide Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Article
- Implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention: Analyzing clinical practice and key characteristics.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionOvarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal gynecologic cancer, often diagnosed at an advanced stage due to nonspecific symptoms and lack of effective screening. Over 90% of all ovarian cancer cases are epithelial in origin, which is thought to originate from the fallopian tubes in approximately 70% of cases. Opportunistic salpingectomy (OS), the additional removal of fallopian tubes during abdominal surgery, has emerged as a preventive strategy. Despite growing evidence, the implementation of OS varies widely. This study examines OS counseling and performance trends in the Netherlands from 2019 to 2022 and identifies associated patient, surgical, physician, and institutional characteristics. MATERIAL AND
methodsA historical cohort study was performed, analyzing electronic medical records from six Dutch hospitals, including two academic, two teaching, and two nonteaching hospitals. Patients undergoing elective gynecologic surgery from January 2019 to December 2022 were considered eligible. Multilevel logistic regression analyses identified characteristics associated with counseling and performance of OS.
resultsOut of 2716 eligible patients, 51% were counseled about OS, of whom 92% opted for the procedure. The counseling rate increased from 38% in 2019 to 57% in 2022, while the performance rate rose from 39% to 56%. OS was more common among patients undergoing hysterectomy, laparoscopic surgery, and treatment at teaching hospitals. OS was less common during vaginal surgery. Physician characteristics accounted for 18% of counseling and 12% of performance variations.
conclusionsAlthough OS implementation improved, substantial variability remains in counseling and performance, largely driven by surgical approach and type of surgery. Targeted interventions to enhance uptake among underutilized surgical types, including vaginal procedures, are necessary to standardize OS practice and ensure wider adoption across all eligible patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.