ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
The State of High-Resolution Imaging of the Human Inner Ear: A Look Into the Black Box.
Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of endoscopic removal of anterior malleolar ligament calcification combined with tympanic membrane repair for the treatment of conductive hearing loss.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- High resolution, contrast-enhanced X-ray microscopy of theFrontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Refined circular autopsy saw design and standardized technique for postmortem human temporal bone procurement and perilymph collection.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Multi-sequence MRI signal intensity ratios as candidate imaging correlates for audiovestibular dysfunction in vestibular schwannoma.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Observational
- The State of High-Resolution Imaging of the Human Inner Ear: A Look Into the Black Box.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unlike most medical fields, otology has not benefited from the transformative impact of high-resolution, cellular-level imaging. The sensorineural cells required for human hearing-located within the cochlea-are just 10-50 µm, placing them outside the resolution of magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and positron emission tomography. These cells are highly mechano- and chemo-sensitive, and their death or dysfunction underlie the vast majority of hearing loss. Further, the cochlea is only 4-7 mm in diameter, has complex anatomy, and is deeply embedded in bone. Cochlear blood flow is partially separated by a blood barrier, limiting access to radiotracers or fluorophores. These and other features have left the human cochlea as a "black box" that cannot be assessed with high precision in vivo, limiting the development of novel hearing loss therapies. The benefits and drawbacks of existing medical imaging techniques used to diagnose disorders of the human inner ear are discussed, as well as those of emerging technologies that may help overcome challenges to access, resolution, and functional detail. A comprehensive and up-to-date discussion is provided on research efforts to improve and adapt current clinical imaging methods and introduce recent innovations that have shown exciting promise for deriving both structural and metabolic information from cochlear cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.