Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2025
Quality of Care and Outcomes of Inpatients with COPD: A Multi-Center Study in China.
Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- COPD Patients with a High Exacerbation Risk: Baseline Data Analysis of a National Chinese Prospective Multi-Center Study of Quality Improvement Project.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Trial
- Validation and Clinical Analysis of the Quantitative COPD Exacerbation Recognition Tool (Q-CERT): Diagnostic Performance and Association with Lung Function Impairment.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Hospitalization due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation is linked to worse prognosis and increased healthcare burden, especially in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of care and outcomes among inpatients with COPD and to identify prognostic factors relate to healthcare quality indicators. Methods: A multi-center, retrospective longitudinal study was conducted. Patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbations between January and December 2017 were randomly sampled from 16 secondary or tertiary public general hospitals in China. Healthcare quality process indicators and clinical outcomes were collected from medical records and patient questionnaires. The median follow-up period was 666 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for readmission or death within 30 days after discharge and for one-year mortality. Results: A total of 891 inpatients with COPD were included. Among them, 14.3% underwent post-bronchodilator spirometry. Documentation of exacerbation history and symptom scores was found in 16.8% and 1.2% of medical records, respectively. Long-acting bronchodilators (LABDs) were prescribed at discharge in 30.3% of cases. Verbal counseling was the primary approach to smoking cessation education, rather than the 5A method. The 30-day readmission rate was 7.1%. The average exacerbation rate was 0.94 per patient during the following year, and the one-year mortality rate was 7.2%. Prescription of inhaled LABDs at discharge was significantly associated with a lower risk of readmission or death within 30 days (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.90, p=0.020). The presence of cardiovascular disease was associated with an increased risk of death within one year (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.24-4.41, p=0.002). Conclusion: The quality of inpatient care for COPD in China showed deficiencies in diagnostics, disease assessment, and patient education. Prescription of inhaled LABDs at discharge was a key quality measure that significantly reduced short-term readmission or mortality, highlighting its importance. Standardized protocols and clinician training are essential to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.