ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025
Survival in Duchenne muscular dystrophy in Australia: a 50 year retrospective cohort study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Improving survival in Duchenne muscular dystrophy across eras: a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Characterization of Dystrophin-Related Syndromes: Carriers, DMD, and BMD.Muscles (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Risk factors for abnormal bone mineral density in Duchenne muscular dystrophy and the association of regular rehabilitation with bone health.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Emergency department visits among patients with neuromuscular diseases receiving home mechanical ventilation: a nationwide population-based study.Journal of Yeungnam medical science · 2026Article
- Translational progress in the development of pharmacotherapies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Regenerative medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is limited evidence describing the changing natural history of DMD in Australia. Methods: This retrospective cohort study collated information on clinical management and disease milestones from medical records of males with DMD attending a paediatric hospital between 1973 and 2019 and linked this to information from two adult tertiary hospitals. Data were stratified by decade of birth and Kaplan Meier analyses were conducted to describe median time to key disease milestones. Findings: The cohort included 356 individuals with DMD with year of birth ranging from 1958 to 2014 and median (interquartile range, IQR) follow up time from diagnosis of 10.5 (4.1, 15.7) years. Use of corticosteroids, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), echocardiography and respiratory support increased over time. Mean age of diagnosis decreased from 6.4 years in those born before 1970 to 3.4 years in those born 2010-2019. Median (IQR) survival increased over time from 18.2 (15.2, 20.4) years in those born before 1970 to 24.0 (20.3, 27.5) years in those born between 1990 and 1999. Increased life expectancy was observed in individuals using corticosteroids, ACE-I and respiratory support. Interpretation: Survival in individuals with DMD has increased over the last five decades, likely due to changes in clinical management. Given the increased population surviving to adulthood, there is a need to enhance clinical services and surveillance to support neuromuscular disease in Australia, especially in transitional care and adult populations. Funding: Independent Research Grant, Pfizer Australia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.