Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40470521›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025

Lessons for future outbreaks from successful contact tracing systems in Asia.

Joanna X R Tan, Hitoshi Oshitani, Lam Phung Khanh, Charuttaporn Jitpeera, Luca Ferretti, Alex R Cook

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joanna X R TanSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Hitoshi OshitaniTohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Lam Phung KhanhSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Charuttaporn JitpeeraMinistry of Health, Thailand.
Luca FerrettiPandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alex R CookSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Countries around the world had utilized contact tracing to support public health responses to curb transmission during the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, countries in East and Southeast Asia had been effective in their contact tracing responses. To understand their successes, the contact tracing systems of Japan, Thailand, Singapore and Vietnam were comparatively analyzed, including the technical aspects of contact tracing approaches, detection and response structures. Through the comparative analysis, we uncovered the key elements within these successful systems, namely speed, capture and accuracy, designed specific for the countries' settings. For the system to work efficiently, we found that maintaining the balance across speed, capture and accuracy while adapting to the disease epidemiology and environment was essential. Contact tracing will remain a vital strategy to control the next epidemic with a pandemic potential. The lessons learnt could provide guiding principles to help enhance contact tracing systems and prepare for future outbreaks.

Indexed as

Contact tracingCOVID-19Outbreak responsePandemic preparedness

Identifiers

PMID40470521
PMCPMC12134535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.