ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Normative isokinetic knee strength values and prediction models in non-athletic Chinese adults.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating raw versus body-weight-normalized McGill core endurance composite scores in recreational weightlifters: implications for strength and functional performance.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Article
- Effects of different induction methods and post-activation potentiation on lower limb muscle activation and explosive power.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Establishing normative isokinetic muscle strength values and prediction models for knee joints in non-athletic healthy Chinese adults aids in clinical assessments, diagnosis, and rehabilitation. However, there has been limited research on these normal reference values, particularly involving large sample cohorts. Therefore, this study aimed to develop normative reference values and predictive models for knee joint isokinetic muscle strength across different age groups and genders in non-athletic healthy Chinese adults. Methods: A total of 2,208 participants aged between 20-70 years old were included in the study. The participants were divided into two groups by gender and further divided into five age groups: 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 and 60-69 years old, resulting in a total of 10 groups. Key parameters, including peak torque of knee flexors and extensors, relative peak torque, peak torque ratio of flexors to extensors, peak torque angle and work, were collected using an isokinetic dynamometer at angular velocities of 60°/s and 180°/s. Two-way analysis of variance was utilised to analyse the characteristics and differences of these parameters amongst different age groups and genders. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to examine the relationships between these parameters and gender, age, height, weight and body mass index. Predictive models were developed using linear regression and various machine learning techniques. Results: Males exhibited significantly higher knee isokinetic strength values than females across all age groups, with knee extensor strength 20.47%-38.01% higher and knee flexor strength 22.91%-43.42% higher at both 60°/s and 180°/s. Muscle strength showed a moderate negative correlation with age, indicating a decline with increasing age. Extension strength values were greater than flexion, and measurements at 180°/s were lower compared to 60°/s. The multilayer perceptron regressor demonstrated the highest predictive capability among the models tested. Conclusion: This study provides comprehensive normative reference values and predictive models for knee joint isokinetic muscle strength in non-athletic healthy Chinese adults. The results highlight significant gender and age differences, offering valuable data for clinical assessments and personalized rehabilitation strategies to improve knee joint health and overall quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.