ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Efgartigimod combined with steroids as a fast-acting therapy for anti-SRP immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case Report: A case of anti-mGluR1 antibody-associated encephalitis treated with efgartigimod combined with rituximab.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy: A Systematic Review of Antibody-Specific Mechanisms and Treatment Outcomes.Cureus · 2025Review
- Recent advances in immunological mechanisms and murine disease models of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.Inflammation and regeneration · 2025Review
- Clinicopathological profiling and prognosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy overlapping with myasthenia gravis: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) is a rare autoimmune disease. Efgartigimod is a human IgG antibody Fc fragment, can enhance the degradation of IgG and thus may be a promising therapeutic agent for IMNM. Methods: All three patients exhibited proximal muscle weakness and markedly increased creatinine kinase (CK) levels. Moreover, the myositis antibody profile revealed positive anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) antibodies in all of them. Muscle biopsy performed on the first patient confirmed IMNM. Eventually, all three patients were diagnosed with anti-SRP IMNM. The first patient initially received methylprednisolone via intravenous injection and then commenced efgartigimod therapy. The second and third patients were treated with a combination of methylprednisolone intravenous injection and efgartigimod. The efficacy of efgartigimod treatment was evaluated by observing the changes in CK values and the manual muscle testing (MMT) score. Safety assessments included adverse events and serious adverse events. Results: Following one cycle of efgartigimod treatment (administered at a dosage of 10 mg/kg, once a week for a total of 4 injections in one period) in these three patients, CK values decreased by 79.30, 95.80, and 93.62%, respectively. Their MMT score increased from 232, 156, and 169 to 242, 258, and 229, respectively. Evidently, these three patients demonstrated significant improvement in muscle strength and decrease of serum CK levels after efgartigimod treatment. No serious adverse events were observed during the efgartigimod treatment. Discussion: Early application of efgartigimod in combination with methylprednisolone for the treatment of anti-SRP-IMNM led to a substantial decrease in CK values and effectively improved muscle strength. Consequently, Efgartigimod may prove to be an effective and safe therapeutic option for IMNM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.