Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40470475›Full record

ArticleArXiv2025

ReBaCCA-ss: Relevance-Balanced Continuum Correlation Analysis with Smoothing and Surrogating for Quantifying Similarity Between Population Spiking Activities.

Xiang Zhang, Chenlin Xu, Zhouxiao Lu, Haonan Wang, Dong Song

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiang ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Chenlin XuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Zhouxiao LuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Haonan WangDepartment of Statistics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado State, United States.
Dong SongDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine.

Funding

Combined Mechanistic and Input-Output Modeling of the Hippocampus During Spatial NavigationRF1DA055665 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SONG, DONG · 2021 to 2021
$1.2M
NIDA NIH HHS RF1 DA055665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantifying similarity between population spike patterns is essential for understanding how neural dynamics encode information. Traditional approaches, which combine kernel smoothing, PCA, and CCA, have limitations: smoothing kernel bandwidths are often empirically chosen, CCA maximizes alignment between patterns without considering the variance explained within patterns, and baseline correlations from stochastic spiking are rarely corrected. We introduce ReBaCCA-ss (Relevance-Balanced Continuum Correlation Analysis with smoothing and surrogating), a novel framework that addresses these challenges through three innovations: (1) balancing alignment and variance explanation via continuum canonical correlation; (2) correcting for noise using surrogate spike trains; and (3) selecting the optimal kernel bandwidth by maximizing the difference between true and surrogate correlations. ReBaCCA-ss is validated on both simulated data and hippocampal recordings from rats performing a Delayed Nonmatch-to-Sample task. It reliably identifies spatio-temporal similarities between spike patterns. Combined with Multidimensional Scaling, ReBaCCA-ss reveals structured neural representations across trials, events, sessions, and animals, offering a powerful tool for neural population analysis.

Identifiers

PMID40470475
PMCPMC12136485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.