ArticleArXiv2025
In Silico Trials for Sex-Specific patient Inclusion Criteria in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Advancing Precision in Heart Failure Treatment.
Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) guidelines are based on clinical trials with limited female representation and inconsistent left bundle branch block (LBBB) definitions. Conventional QRS duration (QRSd) criteria show variable diagnostic accuracy between sexes, partly due to differences in heart size and remodeling. We evaluated the influence of sex, heart size, LBBB, and conduction delay on QRSd and assessed the diagnostic performance of conventional and indexed QRSd criteria using a population-based modelling approach. Simulated QRSd were derived from electrophysiological simulations conducted in 2627 UK Biobank healthy participants and 359 patients with ischemic heart disease, by modelling LBBB and normal activation combined with/without conduction delay. QRSd criteria under-selected LBBB females and over-selected non-LBBB patients. Indexing by LVEDV and LV mass reduced sex disparities but increased the over-selection in non-LBBB patients. Height-indexed QRSd effectively resolved sex differences and maintained low non-LBBB selection rates, demonstrating superior performance and potential for more equitable CRT selection.
Identifiers
40470472PMC12136476What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.