ArticleCureus2025
Thermal Modality-Based Treatment of Gingival Hyperpigmentation: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gingival hyperpigmentation, caused by excessive melanin deposition in the basal and suprabasal layers of the gingival epithelium, is a significant aesthetic concern, particularly for individuals with a high smile line. Although benign, this condition can negatively impact self-confidence, prompting many patients to seek cosmetic treatment. Various depigmentation techniques exist, including scalpel surgery, cryotherapy, electrosurgery, and laser therapy, each offering distinct advantages and limitations. This case report presents a comparative evaluation of diode laser and electrosurgery for gingival depigmentation using a split-mouth approach. The mandibular arch was treated with an 810 nm diode laser (Surgical Laser Clean Cut, 810NM/10W; Confident Dental Equipments, Bangalore, India), while the maxillary arch was treated using a monopolar electrosurgical unit (Younique Dental Innovations R.F. Advance; Motranser, Waipu, Taiwan). Clinical parameters assessed included healing time, intraoperative bleeding control, patient comfort, and recurrence rates over a six-month follow-up period. Findings suggest that while electrosurgery provided superior hemostasis, the diode laser led to faster healing and a lower recurrence rate. This study highlights the importance of selecting an appropriate depigmentation technique based on patient-specific needs, emphasizing the role of minimally invasive procedures in modern periodontal esthetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.