Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40470412›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Hepatobiliary Iminodiacetic Acid (HIDA) Scan in the Evaluation of Biliary Atresia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Fatma M Al Hajri, Badriya Al Suqri, Khalid Al Busaidi, Athari Al-Obaidani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fatma M Al HajriNuclear Medicine, Royal Hospital, Muscat, OMN.
Badriya Al SuqriNuclear Medicine, Royal Hospital, Muscat, OMN.
Khalid Al BusaidiNuclear Medicine, Royal Hospital, Muscat, OMN.
Athari Al-ObaidaniRadiology, Oman Medical Specialty Board, Muscat, OMN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scan in infants, based on examinations performed in the nuclear medicine department at the Royal Hospital. The scan results will be compared to clinical outcomes following liver biopsy, considering ultrasound findings and liver enzyme results. The findings will be analyzed alongside published data through a literature review. This study is expected to contribute to the standardization of imaging protocols, support a multidisciplinary diagnostic approach, and ultimately enhance affected infants' diagnosis, prognosis, and quality of life. Methods The Royal Hospital Research Committee granted official ethical approval for this research. The HIDA scans done from 2015 to the end of 2023 were retrospectively evaluated. The data was collected by accessing medical records, clinical files, and imaging in picture archiving and communications systems (PACS). Diagnostic accuracy of HIDA scans in detecting problems with the gallbladder was measured using the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV). HIDA scan results were compared with the histopathology findings and the clinical follow-ups. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 53 infant patients were included in this cohort retrospective analysis. The most common presentation was conjugated hyperbilirubinemia, observed in 88.7% of cases, with a mean conjugated bilirubin level of 115.3 µmol/L. HIDA scan results were abnormal in 33 patients (62.3%) and normal in 20 patients (37.7%). Based on combined histopathological findings and long-term clinical outcomes, 21 patients were confirmed to have biliary atresia (BA), while 32 were negative. The HIDA scan correctly identified 20 of the 21 actual cases. There were eight false-positive results in which the HIDA scan suggested BA, but patients improved without intervention, most later diagnosed with neonatal hepatitis. Only one case was a false negative. Conclusion The results align with the reported sensitivity and specificity in the literature. This shows that while the HIDA scan is highly sensitive and effective in detecting BA, it has moderate specificity. Therefore, histopathological evaluation remains essential for confirming the diagnosis. The high NPV makes the HIDA scan very helpful in ruling out the diagnosis of BA, hence avoiding further invasive investigations in patients with a negative HIDA result.

Indexed as

biliary atresiacholestatic jaundiceliver biopsyneonatal hepatitisneonatal jaundice

Identifiers

PMID40470412
PMCPMC12134408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.