ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2025
Artificial intelligence for predicting 30-day mortality after surgery for femoral shaft fractures: A retrospective study.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mirror, mirror on the wall, can artificial intelligence predict it all?Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Interpretable artificial intelligence for predicting blood transfusion after surgery for femoral shaft fractures: A retrospective analysis.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Association of albumin, ASA class, and time with mortality, Re-admission, and Re-operation after proximal femoral fracture fixation.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Surgical repair of femoral shaft fractures continues to have notable perioperative morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study is to assess whether artificial intelligence (AI)-driven models can be utilised to predict 30-day mortality after surgery for femoral shaft fractures and to identify patient risk factors for mortality using AI. Methods: This retrospective study utilised data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program between 2015 and 2020. Five AI-driven models were developed and tested using patient clinical information to predict mortality within 30 days of surgery. Additionally, the most important variables for the best-performing model were identified. Results: A total of 1720 patients were identified, and the 30-day mortality rate after femoral shaft fracture surgery was 3.4% (n = 58). XGBoost demonstrated the best predictive performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83, a calibration intercept of -0.03, a calibration slope of 1.17, and a Brier score of 0.02. The most important variables for prediction were age, preoperative white blood cell count, creatinine, haematocrit, platelets, blood urea nitrogen, and body mass index. Conclusion: This study is the first to internally validate an AI-driven model for predicting mortality within 30 days of surgery in an isolated population of femoral shaft fracture patients, demonstrating good performance. Further research is needed to develop an excellent-performing, AI-driven model that is externally validated prior to clinical translation to support anaesthesiologists and orthopaedic surgeons in perioperative risk stratification and patient education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.