ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2025
To evaluate the effect of two ventilatory strategies (conventional bag-mask ventilation vs. manual jet ventilation) on peak inspiratory pressures and dynamic compliance using electrical impedance tomography in adult patients undergoing interventional rigid bronchoscopy for central airway obstruction under total intravenous anaesthesia - A pilot randomised controlled study: VENTIJET-EIT study.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A novel nasal cannula versus conventional face mask for preventing hypoxemia during flexible bronchoscopy in children: a randomized controlled trial.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Interventional rigid bronchoscopy (IRB) for central airway obstruction (CAO) may lead to significant changes in airway pressures and compliance. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of conventional bag-mask ventilation versus manual jet ventilation on peak inspiratory pressures (PIPs) and dynamic compliance measured by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) during IRB for CAO. Methods: This pilot randomised controlled study included 60 patients in two groups: Group BMV (conventional bag-mask ventilation performed with manual coordination of self-inflating bag pressure and careful observation of chest expansion) and Group JET (manual jet ventilation with Sander's adapter under total intravenous anaesthesia). PIP and dynamic compliance were measured pre- and post-IRB using EIT with the insertion of an I-gel airway device. Results: The mean PIP pre- and post-IRB with Group BMV was found to be significantly lower, that is, 24.13 [standard deviation (SD): 8.33] versus 21.56 (SD: 6.71) ( Conclusion: Conventional bag-mask ventilation and jet ventilation provide comparable outcomes in terms of PIP, dynamic compliance and regional distribution of ventilation in patients undergoing IRB for CAO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.