ArticleFrontiers in neurorobotics2025
Gait analysis system for assessing abnormal patterns in individuals with hemiparetic stroke during robot-assisted gait training: a criterion-related validity study in healthy adults.
Article in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SANE (eaSy gAit aNalysis systEm): real-time dual-depth, marker-less system characterisation and robustness of gait parameters.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gait robots have the potential to analyze gait characteristics during gait training using mounted sensors in addition to robotic assistance of the individual's movements. However, no systems have been proposed to analyze gait performance during robot-assisted gait training. Our newly developed gait robot," Welwalk WW-2000 (WW-2000)" is equipped with a gait analysis system to analyze abnormal gait patterns during robot-assisted gait training. We previously investigated the validity of the index values for the nine abnormal gait patterns. Here, we proposed new index values for four abnormal gait patterns, which are anterior trunk tilt, excessive trunk shifts over the affected side, excessive knee joint flexion, and swing difficulty; we investigated the criterion validity of the WW-2000 gait analysis system in healthy adults for these new index values. Methods: Twelve healthy participants simulated four abnormal gait patterns manifested in individuals with hemiparetic stroke while wearing the robot. Each participant was instructed to perform 16 gait trials, with four grades of severity for each of the four abnormal gait patterns. Twenty strides were recorded for each gait trial using a gait analysis system in the WW-2000 and video cameras. Abnormal gait patterns were assessed using the two parameters: the index values calculated for each stride from the WW-2000 gait analysis system, and assessor's severity scores for each stride. The correlation of the index values between the two methods was evaluated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient for each gait pattern in each participant. Results: The median (minimum to maximum) values of Spearman rank correlation coefficient among the 12 participants between the index value calculated using the WW-2000 gait analysis system and the assessor's severity scores for anterior trunk tilt, excessive trunk shifts over the affected side, excessive knee joint flexion, and swing difficulty were 0.892 (0.749-0.969), 0.859 (0.439-0.923), 0.920 (0.738-0.969), and 0.681 (0.391-0.889), respectively. Discussion: The WW-2000 gait analysis system captured four new abnormal gait patterns observed in individuals with hemiparetic stroke with high validity, in addition to nine previously validated abnormal gait patterns. Assessing abnormal gait patterns is important as improving them contributes to stroke rehabilitation. Clinical trial registration: https://jrct.niph.go.jp, identifier jRCT 042190109.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.