ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
High throughput assessment of blueberry fruit internal bruising using deep learning models.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reutilization of berry by-products for green food additives: a comprehensive review and future perspectives.NPJ science of food · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rising costs and labor shortages have sparked interest in machine harvesting of fresh-market blueberries. A major drawback of machine harvesting is the occurrence of internal bruising, as the fruit undergoes multiple mechanical impacts during this process. Evaluating fruit internal bruising manually is a tedious and time-consuming process. In this study, we leveraged deep learning models to rapidly quantify berry fruit internal bruising. Blueberries from 61 cultivars of soft to firm types were subjected to bruise over a three-year period from 2021-2023. Dropped berries were sliced in half along the equator and digitally photographed. The captured images were first analyzed using the YOLO detection model to identify and isolate individual fruits with bounding boxes. Then YOLO segmentation models were performed on each fruit to obtain the fruit cross-section area and the bruising area, respectively. Finally, the bruising ratio was calculated by dividing the predicted bruised area by the predicted cross-sectional area. The mean Average Precision (mAP) of the bruising segmentation model was 0.94. The correlation between the bruising ratio and ground truth was 0.69 with a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 15.87%. Moreover, analysis of bruising ratios of different cultivars revealed significant variability in bruising susceptibility and the mean bruising ratio of 0.22 could be an index to differentiate the bruise-resistant and bruise-susceptible cultivars. Furthermore, the mean bruising ratio was negatively correlated with mechanical texture parameter, Young's modulus 20% Burst Strain. Overall, this study presents an effective and efficient approach with a user-friendly interface to evaluate blueberry internal bruising using deep learning models, which could facilitate the breeding of blueberry genotypes optimized for machine harvesting. The models are available at https://huggingface.co/spaces/c-tan/blueberrybruisingdet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.