ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Perception of body translation amplitude in altered gravity during parabolic flight.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to assess how individuals perceive the amplitude of passive body translation in microgravity and hypergravity. Methods: Six subjects participated in parabolic flights aboard the Novespace A-310 Zero-G aircraft, performing tasks that involved linear translation ranging from 25 to 250 cm across different axes, all while blindfolded. After each motion stimulus, subjects reported their perceived displacement, while trial duration and movement amplitude and dynamics were recorded. Results: Results showed that the perceived amplitudes of translations were accurate in 1 g. However, subjects significantly underestimated distances in 0 g and overestimated them in 1.8 g. Discussion: These findings suggest that, in microgravity, the lack of gravitational cues disrupts the vestibular system's ability to provide accurate information on body movement, leading to altered motion perception. The role of temporal cues in estimating movement, particularly when gravitational input is altered, is inferred since the reports were made following each trial. Countermeasures such as visual aids and proprioceptive devices could help astronauts improve distance and time estimates during long-duration missions, especially in vehicles with restricted visibility or when operating rovers on Lunar or Martian terrains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.