ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
The effect of nordic walking with poles with an integrated resistance shock absorber on muscle stiffness and elasticity indicators in postmenopausal women.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Understanding the impact of physical activity and its relationship with changes in the biomechanical parameters of the myofascial system at different stages of menopause is important for planning and implementing effective action strategies. The reduction in elasticity and increase in stiffness in upper limb muscles, including in particular tonic muscles, lead to mobility limitations and increased risk of pain. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the impact of different types of Nordic walking training on muscle stiffness and elasticity indicators in postmenopausal women. Methods: Thirty women were randomly assigned to two training groups using different kind of poles and completed 8 weeks of training program. Before starting the training programs and after their completion, total fat, lean body mass were measured, along with muscle stiffness and elasticity indicators. Main calculations was based on 2 × 2 analysis of variance ANOVA with repeated measures. Results: The significant interaction effect was found in differences between the two groups of women with respect to the upper trapezius muscle (p = 0.037). Significant "time" effects were observed for the triceps brachii and brachioradialis muscles (p = 0.032, p = 0.028, respectively) as a result of increased post-intervention muscle stiffness for all participants. Discussion: The upper trapezius may be the muscle most strongly engaged during the training, which may lead to sustained passive changes and should have an influence on recommendations on the use of RSA poles in population of postmenopausal women in selected clinical conditions. NW training with RSA poles may be an alternative to traditional NW training for individuals whose physical fitness and health status allows them to engage in such training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.