ReviewResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025
Vitamin K deficiency bleeding in children with cholestatic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vitamin K deficiency (VKD) in cholestatic liver disease affects up to 23% of pediatric patients. While several vitamin K (VK) prophylaxis regimens have been proposed, optimal therapeutic strategies remain undefined. The study aimed to identify the most effective VK prophylaxis for children with cholestatic liver disease. We conducted a systematic review of articles focusing on studies of children aged <18 years with cholestatic liver disease who reported outcomes of either VKD or vitamin K deficiency bleeding (VKDB) after VK prophylaxis. The articles were sourced from PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. A meta-analysis was performed to determine the prevalence of VKD and the efficacy of each prophylactic protocol in preventing VKD/VKDB. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD 42021270048). Of the 889 articles, 37 were selected (2 comparative studies, 6 noncomparative studies, and 29 case reports/series). The results from the comparative studies indicated a lower incidence of VKD in the parenteral than that in the oral VK. The meta-analysis of the noncomparative studies showed the prevalence of VKD in high prothrombin induced by vitamin K absence-II group was 56% (95% CI, 45%-68%;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.