ArticleResearch square2025
Impact of cerebellar stroke on established and emergent reading skills: Evidence of alexia.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined the impact of cerebellar stroke on both well-established reading skills and emergent literacy abilities using a combination of static and dynamic assessments. The static component involved a lexical decision task featuring novel orthographic forms (pseudowords) followed by tests of orthographic memory. The dynamic component employed a training protocol in an artificial orthography, requiring participants to learn new grapheme-phoneme correspondences and read in a novel script. Participants included individuals with cerebellar stroke (n = 13) and demographically matched controls (n = 13). Results indicated that cerebellar damage impairs phonological decoding processes, disrupting both reading of novel forms in a familiar orthography and the acquisition of new orthographic-phonological mappings. Notably, five of the 13 cerebellar patients met criteria for phonological alexia, though no clear relationship emerged between symptom severity and lesion characteristics. These findings underscore the cerebellum's role in phonological decoding and its contribution to both established and emergent aspects of reading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.