Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40470247›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

A Robust Neuromuscular Interface to Restore Lost Function in People with Amputations.

Alex Vaskov, Dylan Wallace, Karan Desai, Ann Laidlaw, Theodore Kung, Deanna Gates, Stephen Kemp, Cynthia Chestek, Paul Cederna

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07420192 (The Effect of Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07420192 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery on Neuropathic Pain and Functional Outcomes in Major Lower Extremity Amputations

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSaglik Bilimleri UniversitesiRan2026 to 2030Enrolled20ConditionsSymptomatic Neuroma, Phantom Limb Pain After Amputation, Residual Limb Pain, Neuropathic PainArmsRegenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alex VaskovUniversity of Michigan-Ann Arbor.ORCID 0000-0002-2336-9877
Dylan WallaceUniversity of Michigan-Ann Arbor.
Karan DesaiUniversity of Michigan-Ann Arbor.
Ann LaidlawUniversity of Michigan-Ann Arbor.
Theodore KungUniversity of Michigan-Ann Arbor.
Deanna GatesUniversity of Michigan-Ann Arbor.
Stephen KempUniversity of Michigan-Ann Arbor.ORCID 0000-0002-5608-3584
Cynthia ChestekUniversity of Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-9671-7051
Paul CedernaUniversity of Michigan-Ann Arbor.

Funding

Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface for Restoring Individual Finger Movement in People with Upper Limb AmputationsR01NS105132 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHESTEK, CYNTHIA ANNE · 2018 to 2022
$2.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper limb loss can negatively impact an individual's ability to perform daily tasks as well as mental health and well-being. Currently available prosthetic control interfaces provide limited prosthetic finger dexterity compared to the complex functions that multi-articulating robotic hands are capable of actuating. A significant barrier is the ability to reliably sense efferent motor action potentials from peripheral nerves when a patient's muscles are lost or damaged due to amputation and injury. In an early-feasibility clinical trial, we implanted four patients with intramuscular electrodes in Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces (RPNIs). In all patients, the electrodes recorded large-amplitude and stable control signals from RPNIs with a median Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) of 40.6 throughout their study participation. No serious adverse events occurred related to the electrode implantation or the devices themselves. Furthermore, implanting RPNIs provided valuable information to create an algorithm to predict movements previously mediated by lost muscles. These results indicate RPNI-electrode implantation is a repeatable and viable technique to record nerve signals for prosthetic control.

Identifiers

PMID40470247
PMCPMC12136193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.