ArticleResearch square2025
A Robust Neuromuscular Interface to Restore Lost Function in People with Amputations.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07420192 (The Effect of Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery on Neuropathic Pain and Functional Outcomes in Major Lower Extremity Amputations
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Upper limb loss can negatively impact an individual's ability to perform daily tasks as well as mental health and well-being. Currently available prosthetic control interfaces provide limited prosthetic finger dexterity compared to the complex functions that multi-articulating robotic hands are capable of actuating. A significant barrier is the ability to reliably sense efferent motor action potentials from peripheral nerves when a patient's muscles are lost or damaged due to amputation and injury. In an early-feasibility clinical trial, we implanted four patients with intramuscular electrodes in Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces (RPNIs). In all patients, the electrodes recorded large-amplitude and stable control signals from RPNIs with a median Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) of 40.6 throughout their study participation. No serious adverse events occurred related to the electrode implantation or the devices themselves. Furthermore, implanting RPNIs provided valuable information to create an algorithm to predict movements previously mediated by lost muscles. These results indicate RPNI-electrode implantation is a repeatable and viable technique to record nerve signals for prosthetic control.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.