ArticleResearch square2025
Present or Absent: Risks and protective factors of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in the Zambian context.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Despite a reduction in Sudden Unexplained Infant Death (SUID) in high-income countries, the incidence of SUID and the prevalence of its risk and protective factors remain poorly understood in Zambia due to limited research. The aim of our study was to describe the infant sleep positions and sleep environments in an urban Zambian population to gain a better understanding of the modifiable risk factors for SUID. Methods: Data from the Zambian Infant Cohort Study (ZICS), a prospective birth cohort, were collected to describe infant sleep practices in Chawama, a densely populated peri-urban community in Lusaka, Zambia. During the 20-week study visit a structured questionnaire was administered to obtain data about the sleeping and environmental risks associated with SUID. Results: Data were collected from 596 caregivers and 605 infants. Only 6.4% of caregivers did attain an education beyond secondary school, and a significant proportion of infants (20.2%) had low birth weights, with 10.7% of infants confirmed by ultrasound as preterm. Furthermore, 96.5% of infants were placed to sleep on their side or in a prone position, and 98.2% of infants shared a sleep surface with their caregiver. Breastfeeding, a protective factor, was highly prevalent, with 90.2% of infants receiving some form of breastfeeding at the 24-week visit. Conclusion: The results of this study show that both modifiable (bed-sharing and prone sleep position) and non-modifiable risk factors (low birthweight and prematurity) of SUID are prevalent in this low socioeconomic setting in Zambia. Public health strategies to prevent SUID will need to be innovative and culturally congruent in addressing modifiable risks, such as bedsharing, in settings where there is a lack of space. Trial registration: Trial number: 1R01HD094650.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.