ArticleResearch square2025
Investigating the role of structural wall stress on aortic growth prognosis in acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: False lumen expansion is a major factor that determines long-term survival of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD). The objective of this study was to investigate whether structural wall stress distributions computed from patient-specific acute TBAD geometries can be used to predict aortic growth rates. Methods: Three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography angiography (CTA) of 9 patients with acute uncomplicated TBAD were obtained at initial hospital admission and at their most recent follow-up visits. Patient-specific structural wall stress distributions were computed from the initial baseline CTA using a forward penalty method. Spatially varying blood pressure distributions, derived from computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations informed by patient-specific transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and blood pressure (BP) measurements, were incorporated into the forward penalty stress analysis. Aortic growth rates were quantified and visualized within the 3D TBAD geometries using the initial baseline and follow-up scans. Linear mixed-effects regression analyses were performed to evaluate the spatial correlations between biomechanical markers (structural wall stress, wall shear stress, and pressure) and aortic growth rates. Results: Utilizing initial baseline CTA, TTE, and BP data, the forward penalty analyses revealed hemodynamic and structural mechanics insights of acute uncomplicated TBADs. The linear mixed-effects model indicated that the fixed-effect association between structural wall stress and aortic growth rate distributions was statistically significant (p=0.039), which demonstrated that aortic segments experiencing high wall stress exhibited rapid growth. Fixed-effect associations were not significant when predicting growth rate using wall shear stress (p=0.86) or pressure (p=0.61) distributions. Significant Pearson correlation coefficients (p<0.05) were observed between structural wall stress and aortic growth rate in all patients. Conclusion: High structural wall stress was associated with regions of high aortic growth rates, while false lumen thrombosis was associated with low wall stress. Structural wall stress derived from the forward penalty approach may be a novel predictor of aortic growth rate and failure of optimal medical therapy in acute TBAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.