ArticleResearch square2025
Enhancing Substance Use Detection in Clinical Notes with Large Language Models.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying substance use behaviors in electronic health records (EHRs) is challenging because critical details are often buried in unstructured notes that use varied terminology and negation, requiring careful contextual interpretation to distinguish relevant use from historical mentions or denials. Using MIMIC-III/IV discharge summaries, we created a large, annotated drug detection dataset to tackle this problem and support future systemic substance use surveillance. We then investigated the performance of multiple large language models (LLMs) for detecting eight substance use categories within this data. Evaluating models in zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning configurations, we found that a fine-tuned model, Llama-DrugDetector-70B, outperformed others. It achieved near-perfect F1-scores (≥ 0.95) for most individual substances and strong scores for more complex tasks like prescription opioid misuse (F1=0.815) and polysubstance use (F1=0.917). These findings demonstrate that LLMs significantly enhance detection, showing promise for clinical decision support and research, although further work on scalability is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.