Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40470171›Full record

ArticleThe South African journal of physiotherapy2025

Current state of evidence-based practice in clinical physiotherapy.

Ronel Roos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The South African journal of physiotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ronel RoosDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5254-0875

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a process that a clinician undertakes, implementing his or her clinical expertise while collaborating with the patient or client in the sociocultural context of care using the best available research evidence to inform practice. The approach has evolved over time in relation to its name, definition, scope and specific steps. In October 2001, member organisations of World Physiotherapy (then the World Confederation for Physical Therapy) gathered in London to discuss the status of EBP in the profession and to gain buy-in from regions to ensure that EBP would become a culture of practice in all regions. The purpose of this article is to describe the current state of EBP during physiotherapy as presented in the literature. Two decades have passed since this meeting, with noteworthy developments in clinical practice, education and research synthesis. Physiotherapists' opinions and attitudes towards EBP are favourable but do not always ensure good implementation and execution during clinical practice. Standardised outcome measures to evaluate the EBP of physiotherapists are available. Barriers remain, which are multifactorial, and facilitators such as time, support and education are integral to optimise implementation. The launch of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database is one strategy that facilitates EBP in physiotherapy. Clinical implications: A culture of EBP exists upon reflection of published literature from different world regions. Consistent, quality implementation of EBP, including shared decision making with patients and evaluation of evidence implemented during clinical practice remain necessary.

Indexed as

clinical practiceevidence-based physiotherapyevidence-based practicephysical therapyphysiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40470171
PMCPMC12135705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.