Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40470160›Full record

ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025

Diagnostic Challenges and Patient Safety: The Critical Role of Accuracy - A Systematic Review.

Talal Ali F Alharbi, Mohammad Rababa, Hamad Alsuwayl, Abdulmajeed Alsubail, Waleed Sulaiman Alenizi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Talal Ali F AlharbiDepartment of Psychiatric, Mental Health and Community Health, College of Nursing, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad RababaDepartment of Adult Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-4747-4217
Hamad AlsuwaylBranch of the Ministry of Health in Qassim Region, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulmajeed AlsubailBranch of the Ministry of Health in Qassim Region, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Waleed Sulaiman AleniziBranch of the Ministry of Health in Qassim Region, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate diagnosis is critical for patient safety, guiding treatment and preventing harm. Diagnostic errors remain prevalent, contributing to avoidable harm, increased healthcare costs, and morbidity. Understanding diagnostic accuracy is essential to improving clinical outcomes. Objective: This review aims to systematically explore the impact of accurate diagnosis on patient safety, identifying challenges in current diagnostic practices and strategies for improvement. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted from 2010-2024. Initial screening yielded 579 records, using keywords like "accurate diagnosis", "diagnostic errors", and "patient safety." A full-text review of 125 studies was conducted after duplicates were eliminated and titles and abstracts were screened for relevancy. Exclusion criteria excluded studies with inadequate data, non-English publications, and opinion pieces, while inclusion criteria mandated that studies concentrate on patient safety and diagnostic accuracy in acute care settings. Ultimately, 26 studies were found to meet the final eligibility requirements and were added to the review. Retrospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials were among the study designs. Results: Accurate diagnosis was found to improve treatment efficacy, enhances patient safety, and reduces unnecessary procedures. Challenges include cognitive biases, insufficient diagnostic tools, and fragmented care. Technological advancements, including artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, were found to significantly enhance diagnostic precision. Despite these benefits, variability in clinical skills and systemic barriers remain substantial obstacles. Conclusion: Accurate diagnosis is essential to enhancing patient safety. The results of this review indicate that using AI tools, improving clinician training, and creating standardized diagnostic procedures may help reduce diagnostic errors; however, because of the small dataset and lack of meta-analysis, the findings should be interpreted cautiously. To further evaluate the effect of diagnostic accuracy on patient safety, future research should concentrate on carrying out larger-scale studies and statistical validations.

Indexed as

accurate diagnosisartificial intelligencediagnostic errorshealthcare outcomespatient safety

Identifiers

PMID40470160
PMCPMC12134007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.